01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 |
121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 |
<= [791][792][793][794][795][796][797][798][799][800] => |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791) Arminius, 10.08.2015, 13:42, 14:43, 17:45, 17:47, 18:35, 18:45, 19:10, 21:34, 21:41, 22:02 (3481-3490)
James S. Saint wrote:
Demographically armed societies are dangerous to the other socities and also to themselves, because they tend more to violence than the demographically unarmed societies.James S. Saint wrote:
You mean that Heinsohn's theory of the youth bulge is a typical NWOdor propaganda?
Orbie wrote:
Okay, so you would vote:Demographically armed societies are extremely dangerous, thus very much more dangerous than other societies.But you do not need to vote. It is also okay to not vote.
Copied
post in another thread.
|
3484 |
3485 |
3486 |
3487 |
3488 |
3489 |
3490 |
Trouble with me is that i always think i can out-think historical philosophers, as if we are the apex. What i said was true even if Goethe knows something, and what Goethe said in the quote seemed a tad arrogant [not that i can speak lol] and in itself not true. **
792) Arminius, 11.08.2015, 01:35, 01:41, 02:43, 03:36, 14:14, 14:20, 14:45, 15:18, 15:41, 15:55, 18:20, 18:53, 19:34, 20:03, 20:11, 20:30 (3491-3506)
Platospuppy wrote:
Using the comparison of military armed societiers and demographically armed societiers is misleading. Both are military armed societiers.
Copied post in another thread.
Criticism of Dawkins' meme theory:Luis Benitez-Bribiesca M.D., a critic of memetics, calls the theory a pseudoscientific dogma and a dangerous idea that poses a threat to the serious study of consciousness and cultural evolution. As a factual criticism, Benitez-Bribiesca points to the lack of a code script for memes (analogous to the DNA of genes), and to the excessive instability of the meme mutation mechanism (that of an idea going from one brain to another), which would lead to a low replication accuracy and a high mutation rate, rendering the evolutionary process chaotic.British political philosopher John Gray has characterized Dawkins' memetic theory of religion as nonsense and not even a theory ... the latest in a succession of ill-judged Darwinian metaphors, comparable to Intelligent Design in its value as a science.Another critique comes from semiotic theorists such as Deacon and Kull. This view regards the concept of meme as a primitivized concept of sign. The meme is thus described in memetics as a sign lacking a triadic nature. Semioticians can regard a meme as a degenerate sign, which includes only its ability of being copied. Accordingly, in the broadest sense, the objects of copying are memes, whereas the objects of translation and interpretation are signs.[clarification needed]Fracchia and Lewontin regard memetics as reductionist and inadequate. Evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr disapproved of Dawkins' gene-based view and usage of the term meme, asserting it to be an unnecessary synonym for concept, Mayr reasoning that concepts are not restricted to an individual or a generation, may persist for long periods of time, and may evolveSources:- Benitez Bribiesca, Luis (January 2001), Memetics: A dangerous idea (PDF), Interciencia: Revista de Ciencia y Technologia de América (Venezuela: Asociación Interciencia) 26 (1): 2931, ISSN 0378-1844, retrieved 2010-02-11, If the mutation rate is high and takes place over short periods, as memetics predict, instead of selection, adaptation and survival a chaotic disintegration occurs due to the accumulation of errors.- Gray, John (2008-03-15), John Gray on secular fundamentalists. The Guardian (London).- Deacon, Terrence,The trouble with memes (and what to do about it). The Semiotic Review of Books 10: 3.- Kull, Kalevi (2000), Copy versus translate, meme versus sign: development of biological textuality. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12 (1): 101120.- Fracchia, Joseph, R. C. Lewontin (February 2005), The price of metaphor, History and theory (Weleyan University) 44 (44): 1429, doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00305.x, ISSN 0018-2656, JSTOR 3590779, The selectionist paradigm requires the reduction of society and culture to inheritance systems that consist of randomly varying, individual units, some of which are selected, and some not; and with society and culture thus reduced to inheritance systems, history can be reduced to evolution. [...] [W]e conclude that while historical phenomena can always be modeled selectionistically, selectionist explanations do no work, nor do they contribute anything new except a misleading vocabulary that anesthetizes history.- Mayr, Ernst (1997). The objects of selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Stanford University's HighWire Press®) 94 (6): 20912094. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.6.2091. PMC 33654. PMID 9122151. Archived from the original on November 15, 2013.
Platospuppy wrote:
Again:Platospuppy wrote:
No.
Ignorance upon ignorance.Some people are not capable of seeing a tree, if one shows them a forest.
Jams S. Saint wrote:
You (**) mean that the survived white females and the survived non-white males will eternally chase each other?
Maybe it would have been better, if I had not used the word explain in my opening post. Economics, sociology, and pschology can and do not explain, ... they show, and they show what the common sense already knows (or at least: should know). Economics can show more than sociology and psychology together.
Does your (**) wife like them too?And it seems that you have two left feet: **
Ierrellus wrote:
Probably. In any case: Music is without hate.
My most recent purchase:
Mathematical formulae do not show and prove or disprove anything and everything. But mathematical formulae are very suited for economics, despite the fact that some of them are completely redundant.
Platospuppy wrote:
That seems to be only YOUR experience.
Last week I read one of Lyssa's KT posts and wanted to respond to it by an ILP private message, but I think she can't open private messages coming from ILP. So I respond by this post.Lyssa (on KT) wrote:
Yes. Thank you very much, Lyssa.I hope you will come back to ILP, and I also hope you get to read this.
Orbie wrote:
It is merely classified as hate music. I am not interested in that music, but I think that also the people who like that music are not hateful but happy while listening to it.I like classical music as well as rock music, especially progressive rock and jazz rock.
Phoneutria wrote:
I like it too.Orbie wrote:
Yes, go on, please, Ierrellus!
One lol-smiley is enough, isn't it? |
793) Arminius, 12.08.2015, 04:47, 16:17, 17:47, 17:50, 18:14, 18:29, 19:15, 21:24, 23:54, 23:58 (3507-3516)
Platospuppy wrote:
Did you mean that demographically armed societies are beschenert? Or did you mean that demographically armed societies are bescheuert?
Shieldmaiden has no clue of philosophy. Maybe it is even useless to explain to her what philosophy is.The German philosopher, logician, mathematician Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege (1848-1925) is the father of analytic philosophy, thus the philosophical father of Bertrand Russel (1872-1970) and all other analytic philosophers. See also here (just for example).Allegedly Shieldmaiden's darling is Bertrand Russel. But if she really knew him, then she would not tell such a nonsense about German philosophers, especially about Wolff and Kant, but also about most of the others. And she should try to write Wolff's name correctly.Kant's theory about the emergence and development of planets has been true since 1755 when he invented this theory by thinking about it - without science, because the scientists knew nothing about it at that time. Compare: Immanuel Kant, Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels, 1755.Shieldmaiden should post on a kindergarten webforum.
James S. Saint wrote:
And of suns!Immanuel Kant was sure that (1) the sun emerged from a cosmic cloud, that (2) a dust disk with floating particles was formed by the centrifugal force of the still rapidly rotating sun, and that (3) the planets were glued in this dust disk with floating particles. According to Kant suns and solar systems originate in a rotating cloud of gas that has thus become dense so that it collapses, and planets originate as collections of sun durst parts.
Copied post in another thread.
Platospuppy wrote:
That is a lie and an ad hom! And you know that it is a lie and an ad hom.I never said anything about Jews. And Jews are not demographically armed societies. Demographically armed societies are societies with a youth bulge. That is known. But it is not known as a fascistic theory but as a globalistic theory. You may call globalists Nazis or Glozis (as I do) but not me.Platospuppy wrote:
I asked a question in my thread: How dangerous are demographically armed societies? (**|**). This question implies that there are demographically armed societies. And you want to deny that there are demographically armed societies? There are war and terror in almost all countries with demographically armed societies, thus societies with youth bulges. My question does not mean that I am of the same opinion as Gunnar Heinsohn is, but that does not matter at all, because I just want to know how ILP members answer the question how dangerous demographically armed societies are and what they think about Heinsohn's theory of the youth bulge. That has nothing at all to do with fascism.We all know that you are a paid troll and that you never know what you are talking about. You do not know what demographically armed rmeans. You do not even know what the difference between a virus and a bacterium is. And now you are outing yourself as a racist - a racist who hates demographically unarmed societies.Are you paid by the military industry?If you were for world peace and not against it, then you would argue in my way.
James S. Saint wrote:
But black holes could not be known at that said time, thus: were not known at that said time.James S. Saint wrote:
Yes. Probably Kant would not have accepted it as we do not accept it. However: No human of the 1750's was talking about a big bang ().Kant said, for example, one should overcome dogmatism by using the own intellect.The hypothesis of the big bang has much more to do with dogmatism than with science.
Copied post in another thread.
As you know: He (**) does not know what he is talking about. He confuses viruses with bacteria, he confuses his text with any other text, he confuses destinations with disappointments, he confuses facts with values (like all ILP-Nietzscheanists), he confuses demographically armed societies with demographically unarmed societies, he confuses his own ideological belief with the fascism of the past. So it would be no surprise, if he also confused atomic bombs with demographically armed societies.What shall we do with him?
|
3515 |
3516 |
794) Arminius, 13.08.2015, 01:00, 02:27, 04:45, 05:02, 05:48, 05:57, 15:13, 16:35 (3517-3524)
You are full of hate, envy, and resentments.
I was not talking about the Vienna Circle (Wiener Kreis).Is there anything you can interpret correctly?I also did not say anything against Bertrand Russell. I merely said where he philosophically came from.If you want to put dirt on Russell's philosophically biography, then it is your flaw.Copied post.The German philosopher, logician, mathematician Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege (1848-1925), the father of analytic philosophy thus the philosophical father of Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) and all other analytic philosophers.
|
3520 |
3521 |
So, what should we do with this youth bulge? (A) Put them into a gas chamber? (B) Castrate them? (C) Drop the bomb? **
You are thinking in terms of a military vocabulary. Only a militarily trained person would think of a country with an excess of youth as being »demographically armed«. **
You see population numbers as a threat which needs to be addressed. **
World threats should be categorized in order of priority first. I would categorize nuclear arms as the most important threat to the world at the moment. **
Population numbers could ultimately become a triggering device which could cause a poor country to use nuclear weapons as a threat to black mail the world into supplying them with resources. **
3522 |
That is really beautiful.
To me, the size, scale or the architecture qualities of that villa are not that important. The most beautiful thing about that building is its location and surroundings. It is there just right in the natural beauty, which tends to bloom in unintruded loneliness.
A simple 3-4 room village type cottage would have been not less beautiful than that villa. **
3523 |
What did you do that photo? It looks some kind of computer trick. **
Nevertheless, I would like to visit that, if I could. Though, I do not know whether that would ever become possible for me or not. **
3524 |
795) Hubert Brune, 14.08.2015 **(3525)
Sehr geehrter Herr Dr. Lauterberg.Ich bedanke mich für Ihren Eintrag in mein Gästebuch (**). Ich erteile Ihnen die Erlaubnis, meine Arbeit zur Evolutionstheorie unter Hinweis auf meine Webseiten zu nennen. Versehen Sie bitte bei Hinweisen und Zitaten meinen Namen bzw. meine Webadresse mit den entsprechenden Verweisen (Links) zu den jeweiligen Seiten. Das ist die einzige, aber deutlich zu verstehende Bedingung, die ich stelle. |
|||||
796) Arminius, 14.08.2015, 14:44, 14:53, 20:41, 23:20 (3526-3530)
Platospuppy wrote:
Arminius stands for FREEDOM. In order to get freedom, to free his country and his people, he had to fight, to be a freedom fighter. That is right. If he had not lived, fighted for freedom, and defeated the Romans (but he has!), then not merely several German tribes (as it was!) but all German tribes, thus almost all of the then Europeans would have become slaves, the further history of the Roman emprie would have been a very much different one and with more slaves than it already had.So my username stands for FREEDOM.I am fighting for freedom, yes, and here on ILP this does especially mean: I am fighting for the freedom of thoughts and speech.I am fighting against enslavement, yes, and here on ILP this does especially mean: I am fighting against enslavement of thoughts and speech.What does your username stand for?
Try to learn to read, boy! You have not read the whole thread correctly. I never said the natural slection did not work. Try to read my posts, boy!
James S. Saint wrote:
Exactly.
Phyllo wrote:
A Christianity without God and Jesus Christ would not be a Christianity anymore. It would be a modern religion, thus an ideological exercise, an ideological training.Phyllo wrote:
If spirituality is an exercise or a training, then it is something like a religion too (see above), thus beyond religion is a rhetorical term - used in order to get the global version of something like a syncretistic religion.
You are wrong again. Try to read this thread or at least the following text:
If you are not interested in this thread, then search for another thread. |
797) Arminius, 15.08.2015, 01:21, 01:22, 01:23, 01:45, 02:32, 02:35, 04:34, 13:30, 22:40, 22:59 (3531-3540)
Write numbers from 1 to 6 into the cells of the diagram of size 6 x 6, so that each number occurs exactly once in each row and in each column. A brick must contain an odd and an even number. Two half-bricks in a row at the left and right edge of the diagram form one whole brick.Good speed!
A weighing problem.On an ordinary beam balance the following shapes are in equilibrium: Circle and triangle with the square;
|
3533 |
3534 |
I imagine that 'beyond religion' means the elimination of specific dogmas. Ethics would not come from unique gods but from some universal human feeling (probably love) which would make it binding for all. **
3535 |
Sudoku champion:
4 3 6 5 1 2
2 1 3 6 4 5
5 2 4 3 6 1
3 4 2 1 5 6
1 6 5 2 3 4
6 5 1 4 2 3 **
3536 |
How many triangles weighs a circle?
s = c+t
c = t+p
2s = 3ps = 3/2 p
p = 2/3 s
c = t + 2/3 s = 2/3 c + 2/3 t
1/3 c = 2/3 t
c = 2t1 circle = two triangles **
3537 |
Arminius wrote:
»James S. Saint wrote:
How many triangles weighs a circle?
s = c+t
c = t+p
2s = 3ps = 3/2 p
p = 2/3 s
c = t + 2/3 s = 2/3 c + 2/3 t
1/3 c = 2/3 t
c = 2t1 circle = two triangles **
That is false too.« ** **
I had to interpret your English intention. Could you reword it, seeing how I am solving for it? **
3538 |
Ahhh ... I see that I left out a »t«.
s = c+t [that is the 1st pic]
c = t+p [that is the 2nd pic]
2s = 3p [that is the 3rd pic]from 3rd:
s = 3/2 p
p = 2/3 s
from 2nd:
c = t + 2/3 s
from 1st:
c = t + 2/3 c + 2/3 t
c - 2/3 c = t + 2/3 t
1/3 c = t + 2/3 t
c = 5tAnd in case you missed it from above:
And the correction for the first one:
2 3 6 5 1 4
4 2 3 6 5 1
6 1 4 3 2 5
3 5 2 1 4 6
1 4 5 2 6 3
5 6 1 4 3 2 **
3539 |
Concerning the Uncle and Niece:
When I read »special birthday« I just dropped it. I dislike trying to figure out what someone might think of as a »special birthday«.
But later, just making guesses, I came up with a »special birthday« being 50, in which case the people could be:
7
7
50While the Uncle is 55 and the niece 32.
I have no idea of that is the kind of thing that you were expecting. **
3540 |
798) Arminius, 16.08.2015, 16:25, 22:31, 22:57, 23:09, 23:21, 23:40, 23:59 (3541-3547)
The table (**) is not precise.1) The cumulative share of the global population is not precisely indicated.2) There are some small and very small but independent countries that have a higher GDP-per-capita than USA or Germany.I just name Switzerland, Norway, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Monaco, Bermuda, Qatar ...
GDP density (GDP per km²):GNI per capita based on PPP:For comparison:
|
3543 |
3544 |
I mean a masculine running half of the social world and a feminine running the other half ..., chasing each other. **
3545 |
I hate always being the only kid in the class with his hand up. **
3546 |
The belief that the world needs to be controlled causes the world's need to be controlled. **
3547 |
Arminius wrote:
»Should the world be controlled or not?« ** **
For the sake of life:
NO!
Each small, very small, region "should" wisely control itself. The effort to control everyone else not merely causes all of the atrocities that Man has become so well known for, but destroys all hope of doing anything else until Man is no more.. **
799) Arminius, 17.08.2015, 01:26, 15:41, 16:13, 22:50, 23:19, 23:27, 23:33, 23:51, 23:52, 23:59 (3548-3557)
Maybe the following thread will help you to understand: **
There is no problem with the text, and the task is a pure mathematical one.So again:Copied postCarleas!Please come to the blackboard!
You are not capable of understanding more than two words in one sentence!2 years old children are capable of understanding whole sentences although
they can merely produce 2 or 3 words in one sentence by themselves.
|
3551 |
3552 |
I agree that a whole lot of people visiting fora are doing so because they want to gain recognition. **
But still, if you would have stuck to your initial idea, I think I would have understood better what you want here. Could you explain it in a few sentences to one as dull witted as I? **
3553 |
3554 |
I want to change the scope of this topic from banning Carleas to making it possible to banning an unnamed owner. After the petition has passed, the political hierarchy of ILP should change to fit a hostile take-over, should it ever take place in the future. **
3555 |
This has to be a trick question. Arminius is too smart to ask a question that is so obviously answered with 10:00 is when the clock stopped.. So, what's the trick dude? Nobody's playing so just give us the answer mmkay? **
And what is an identical angle, anyway? **
Both hands of the watch form an identical angle. When did your watch stop precisely? ** **
3556 |
3557 |
Right now my religion that I live by, is basically trying to be kind and just. It's very simple. The second part is metaphysics and cosmology but that is not very important. Golden rule stuff. **
800) Arminius, 18.08.2015, 02:51, 02:54, 04:43, 04:50, 05:11, 05:22, 05:28, 05:34, 05:35, 06:05, 07:58, 16:14, 16:16, 17:16, 17:45, 17:45, 18:19, 23:30, 23:43, 23:54 (3558-3577)
Zoot Allures wrote:
The mathematical meaning of the adjective identical is identical with the mathematical meaning of the adjectives same and equal.Please look at the watch again:There is no doubt. The same angular degree. The two hands of the watch have the same angle. Which one it is is easily to find out.Zoot Allures wrote:
And geometry is not enough.The main part of the task is not a geometrical one, by the way.Zoot Allures wrote:
What I mean is easily to find out by the text and the picture of my post:Copied postZoot Allures wrote:
No.Zoot Allures wrote:
The 12 is the axis line, but that is already clear because of the text and because of the picture. Here comes the picture again:Zoot Allures wrote:
Zoot Allures wrote:
Geometrically no angle is not possible.The equivalents betweenn the numbers of the watch and the degree values:0 <=> 0°.
|
3559 |
If there are only two lines in a circle, the only two angles that can be the same is 180, that's be either 0915 or 1445. You need another line. **
3560 |
I understand everything you've said clearly. We are on the same page on that part. What I don't understand is why any mention of the angle is relevant to the problem.
If the big hand is on 10 and the little hand is on 2, and the watch functions like every other watch in the known universe, and the watch has stopped working, then it stopped working at 10:10. **
3561 |
Graph the two angles. **
3562 |
Oh, it's one of those problems. An exercise in Zeno's paradox. Infinite decimals and shit. Is it almost 10:10, almost almost 10:10, or almost almost almost 10:10? Holy moly, you can keep dividing the spaces between the minutes like ..., infinitely! **
And I thought this was going to be something good. **
3563 |
Nuh-uh, because at a smaller level, the noise that composes the sub-atomic particles that compose the atoms that compose the molecules that compose the elements that compose the material that the hands are made of are still moving.
I told you it was a trick. **
3564 |
Your premise did not specify an angle between a clock arm and 12. That's what I mean by »you need another line«. **
3565 |
3566 |
Arminius obviously meant »the angles from 12 to the hour hand and 12 to the minute hand are identical when it stopped«. **
Your watch has stopped. So it does not work anymore. The little hand of the watch indicates approximately ten o'clock, and the big hand of the watch indicates approximately two o'clock. Both hands of the watch form an identical angle. When did your watch stop precisely? ** **
The answer:
Dubiously assuming that I did the tiny bit of math right:
Time on Clock = 10:9:13.8461538461538.But you have to figure out how to find it. **
3567 |
I can imagine to make up for your poor problem constraint definition, but I can also get two exact angles by drawing a line to 6, getting a different answer whilw still being correct. **
Either it's a trick, or it comes down to the impossibility of stopping the division of infinite decimals/fractions between minutes.
This is not an interesting problem. It is an age old paradox that baffled philosophers who had nothing better to do than be baffled.
James and/or Phoneutria. I demand that you solve the problem and answer the question immediately to prevent Arminius from pwning me. **
3568 |
I can answer but I am not going to bother with calculating it because solving problems is fun, doing math isn't. I'll just hint at how to start solving it, as usual.
This is more akin to the hare and the turtle paradox, zoot, because both arms are constantly moving. By the time you reach 10 minutes, the hour clock has moved forward whatever much an hour arm moves in 10 minutes, making that not an exact angle, so one would have to calculate how many degrees of an angle per minute each of the arms move, (the hour arm moves 360 degrees in 12 hours and the minutes arm moves 360 in 1 hour), or something... I'd do the rest later. I'm tired. **
Yes, Arminius, after you put your imaginary like there, your premise was complete. Also very cute with my lil spider there. **
3569 |
Thanks guys. I understand now. But I'm still stuck on the infinite divisibility of the units of time thing. Also, what if the watch, which isn't digital, stopped before the gear system which turns the hands stopped before the gear teeth were completely seated? You know each each 'tick-tock' is the turn of the gear wheel.. so what if the tension created by the winding, which powers the gears, was at zero percent before the watch completed its final tick?
What time would it then be? You see the infinite divisibility of time units I'm talking about now in a different way. The watch's gear teeth need to be seated in order for a unit of its time to be recognized. It could have stopped somewhere between 10:10 and 10:10.1 for all we know. We have Zeno's wrist watch. **
They used spiral gears - smooth, no slack.
And even if you wanted to quantize the whole thing, you would still solve it in the same way but then truncate the answer to the nearest quantum step. **
3570 |
Not a solution, but: EDIT: oops, missed a page of discussion on this one, :oops: Anyway, this is my untainted first stab.
I'm assuming the equal angle is between the hands of the clock and the vertical. I'm also assuming that the hands are meant to be moving fluidly, such that at exactly 10 O'clock, the hour hand points straight at 10 and the minute hand points straight at 12. At 10:15, the minute hand points straight at three, and the hour hand points at the spot 1/4 of the way between 10 and 11.
So, we can narrow the answer down to between 10 and 10:15.To find the answer, we need to convert time to radians, take the speed of each hand in radians/second, such that the speed of the minute hand 12x faster than the speed of the hour hand, and then find where the values cross (using the absolute value and counting up to pi and back down).
Does that at least get the question right? **
3571 |
Arminius wrote:
»Realising the facts given in the text.« ** **
.... **
The task is about realising the facts given in the text, the recognition of the geometric facts, and the finding of the algebraic solution. ** **
He means this fact .... **
3572 |
Arminius wrote:
»Zoot Allures, what is pwning?« ** **
.... **
Zoot Allures, what is »pwning«?
H = Hours. M = Minutes.
H/12 x 360 + M/60 x 360/12 = 30 H + 0.5 M.
Position of the big hand: M/60 x 360 = 6 M.
Position of the little hand: H/12 x 360 + M/60 x 360/12 = 30 H + 0.5 M.
The sum of both angles is 360°.
So: 30 H + 0.5 M + 6 M = 360.
For H = 10:
300 + 6.5 M = 360 => M = 60/6.5 = 9.231 minutes.
Thus: 9 minutes, 13.8 seconds.
Time on watch: 9 minutes and 13.8 seconds past 10. ** **
Help a linguist out. **
3573 |
Arminius wrote:
»You do not have to do anything of that, because the solution and the solution process are already given. ** **
3574 |
Ah, ok. You're just really bad at irony. **
Tabs are used so when you give the solution, you don't spoil it for people who want to try to solve by themselves. **
Carleas knows that he can click the tabs and see the answer, but he wants to try to solve it on his own. Threads like this aren't really about being the first to solve (since anyone can probably just google for the answers). **
Threads like this aren't really about being the first to solve (since anyone can probably just google for the answers). **
3575 |
3576 |
3577 |
==>
|