<= [641][642][643][644][645][646][647][648][649][650] => |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
641) Herr Schütze, 17.02.2015, 01:40, 15:29 (2556-2557)
Kann eine Männerrechtsbewegung angesichts dieses global - sprich: westlich (d.h.: westlich-global) verordneten und also auch durchorganisierten Feminismus überhaupt etwas bewirken - außer daß diese Männerrechtsbewegung selbst auch zu so etwas wie einem Feminismus wird?Gibt es im sogenannten Westen überhaupt noch echte Männer und echte Weiber angesichts der Tatsache, daß der befohlene Feminismus die Weiber männlich, sofern möglich, und die Männer weiblich, sofern möglich, macht?Übrigens: Ich benutze das Wort Weiber nicht abwertend, sondern aufwertend, nicht als Schimpfort, sondern als Wort der Anerkennung; denn nicht nur sprachlich, sondern auch außersprachlich gilt, daß Weiber weiblicher sind als Frauen.Zuerst wurden aus den Weibern Frauen gemacht, dann Feministinnen und schließlich Genderistinnen. Auf den letzten beiden Entwicklungsstufen nach unten sind dann auch nicht wenige Männer zu finden (Feministen und Genderisten).Dies kann zum Ende der Menschheit führen. Falls das geschehen wird, werden die Maschinen (Androiden und Nicht-Androiden) als die Nachfolger der Menschen übrigbleiben.
Ich weiß nicht, ob eine solche Sichtweise überhaupt etwas mit Pessimismus und Optimismus zu tun hat, denn beide werden schnell mit Realismus und Idealismus verwechselt. Man kann schon einiges wissen über diese Entwicklungen.Ich wüßte auch gern, was MNK über meinen Kommentar denkt, zumal ich ihn in Reaktion auf seinen geschrieben habe.Trotzdem freut es mich natürlich, daß Sie, Herr Lentze, mir geantwortet haben.Die Feminismuskritik ist immer nur so populär, wie es die Herrschenden erlauben. Alles, was ihren Interessen zuwiderläuft, wird von ihnen verboten, tabuisiert oder zumindest unter Verdacht (d.h. den Geheimdiensten zur Verfügung) gestellt. Auch mir ist nicht ganz klar, wie sehr der angebliche Maskulinismus eine ursächliche Rolle spielt bei der feminismuskritischen Entwicklung. Ich sehe in einem solchen Maskulinismus eher ein Alter Ego zum Feminismus (wie ich auch bereits in meinem letzten Kommentar andeutete **), also ein zweites Selbst des Feminismus. Die Fäden dafür, daß es den Feminismus überhaupt geben kann, ziehen ohnehin andere - und die sind obendrein wiederum Männer. Frauen - ich meine echte Frauen, also: Weiber - haben mit dem Feminismus nur insofern zu tun, als sie dessen größte Opfer sind.Als Weiber noch Weiber sein durften, waren sie noch nicht so
versklavt wie heute; doch das änderte sich, als sie zu Frauen
gemacht wurden; seit ihnen der Feminismus aufgezwungen wird, sind
sie in ihrer Mehrheit schon sehr versklavt; und bald werden sie
nur noch Genderistinnen sein dürfen, in ihrer Mehrheit total
versklavt sein und sich an nichts Weibliches mehr erinnern können.
- Das ist schon eine sehr traurige Geschichte.
|
642) Arminius,
18.02.2015, 00:54,
01:24,
01:34,
02:32,
12:41,
13:25,
13:44,
15:10,
15:24,
20:55,
21:38,
21:48,
21:48,
22:03,
22:22,
23:05
(2558-2573)
|
2558 |
2559 |
This is an easy question to answer actually... human genetic code can match machine code, it just depends on whether we engineer humans to be as smart or smarter than machines. That should take all the hype away. I just recently read Gates and hawkings warnings... nonsense, we can engineer humans to control robots with their minds. **
So we will treat humans as and make them machines. Sure, as I said in an earlier post, this is one way machines are replacing humans. **
Arminius wrote:
Here comes the 5th interim balance sheet:
Will machines completely replace all human beings? ** ** | |||
Yes (by trend) |
No (by trend) |
Abstention | |
Arminius, |
Dan, Mr. Reasonable, Fuse, Esperanto, Only Humean, Gib, Uccisore, Zinnat, Barbarianhorde, Ivory Man, Moreno, Ierrellus. |
Obe, Kriswest, Mithus, Nano-Bug, Lizbethrose, Cassie, Eric The Pipe, Backspace Losophy, Sweet Misery, Ralfy, Interterrestrial. |
|
Sum: | 6 | 12 | 11 |
Note:
Yes (by trend) means a yes as acceptance or agreement of about 80-100%.
No (by trend) means a no as acceptance or agreement of about 0-20%.For comparasion:
1st interim balance sheet (**|**),
2nd interim balance sheet (**|**),
3rd interim balance sheet (**|**),
4th interim balance sheet (**|**). ** **
2560 |
2561 |
I cannot stand snow. **
Arminius wrote:
»Yes, unfortunately, you don't get paid for your weather report. I don't get paid for my weather report as well as you, but nonetheless:
Here comes my weather report:
There is snow in my garden, but not much, and it is frozen snow. The temperature is about 0°Celsius (= 32° Fahrenheit). It is not windy.
One month ago, thus on 7 January 2015, there was no snow, and it was not cold: about 10°Celsius (= 50° Fahrenheit). It was very stormy.And you can easily guess what happened to some people between 7 January 2015 and 7 February 2015. ** **
Death by hypothermia .... **
2562 |
It will be a peaceful world when humans have eradicated themselves. **
Up until then, so long as we have people who divorce and separate we will also not have syncretistic anything. **
People will never unify. **
2563 |
I have already said there are a lot of syncretistic religions in existence. You disagreed with this and say there must only be one and not many. **
What example can you give me where syncretism (only one of for all of humanity) has been part of human evolution.
Remember, humans have been and are scattered across many continents.
A Eurocentric view of humanity does not constitute syncretism. **
Sorry, by definition ... unification is required for syncretism. Unless you create a new meaning for the word. **
2564 |
2565 |
2566 |
2567 |
2568 |
Got it,Arm in noose! **
2569 |
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX5kAh_CN0k (**).
This video on experiments done by Yale researchers point to the high probability that humans are born with an inherent moral compass.
This point is in contrast to theists claims of a stone tablet of moral codes issued from God via his messengers.With a neural circuit of moral impulses humanity could develop and establish a morality-ethics framework by themselves collectively and need not have to rely on a God.
Agree? **
2570 |
2571 |
2572 |
2573 |
Then we already have many of such religions. **
643) Herr Schütze, 19.02.2015, 01:40, 18:57, 19:47 (2574-2576)
Der Waldeigentümer bestimmt darüber, welche Bäume dem Wald angehören dürfen, welche Bäume dazukommen dürfen, welche Bäume herausgenommen werden sollen, ob Angestellte mit der Aufsicht über den Wald beauftragt werden ... u.s.w..Es gibt viele Gruppen, sogenannte Bewegungen, die von den Herrschern gern gesehen, ja absolut unterstützt werden, während andere nicht gern gesehen, nicht geduldet, dafür aber um so mehr diskriminiert und politisch verfolgt werden. Ich glaube, ich muß hier jetzt nicht diejenigen Gruppen bzw. Bewegungen aufzählen, die von der Herrschern bevorzugt und absolut unterstützt werden, denn sie sind mittlerweile fast jedem Menschen bekannt. Zu denjenigen Gruppen bzw. Bewegungen jedoch, die nicht gern gesehen, nicht geduldet, dafür aber um so mehr diskriminiert und politisch verfolgt werden, gehören auch (nämlich neben vielen anderen) die Männerbewegung, der Maskulinismus, und diese Tatsache ist leider noch nicht fast jedem Menschen bekannt, sollte es aber sein.Die Männerbewegung ist einer der vielen gesellschaftlichen Bäume, die von den derzeitigen Eigentümern des gesellschaftlichen Waldes geächtet werden, also in deren gesellschaftlichen Wald verboten sind.Diejenigen, die in Webforen oder Weblogs die Richtung vorgeben und die Stimmung in ihrem Sinne anheizen, sind einige der von den Eigentümern des gesellschaftlichen Waldes beauftragten Angestellten. Ihr Auftrag lautet: Haltet unseren Wald so sauber und rein wie möglich, entfernt das Ungeziefer in ihm und verhindert, daß dort Bäume wachsen, die wir geächtet haben, weil wir sie nicht sehen wollen!
Das EU-System mit seinem Subsystem namens Euro ist bei weitem gefährlicher als das BRD-System. Auch das NATO-System ist bei weitem gefährlicher als das BRD-System. Außerdem gibt es zwischen dem EU-System und dem NATO-System Widersprüchlichkeiten, ja Streitigkeiten, die als Wirtschaftskriege gedeutet werden können. Aber Vorsicht: Die Alternativen dazu können noch gefährlicher werden! Es ist nicht so einfach, aus einem dieser Systeme auszusteigen, ohne dafür Prügel zu beziehen. Wir sollten also den anderen Völkern des wahnsinnigen EU-Systems und/oder des wahnsinnigen NATO-Systems den Vortritt lassen, z.B. den Italienern oder Franzosen. Alles andere würde auf ein Wiederholungszwang hinauslaufen, d.h. wir würden sofort den 3. Weltkrieg aufgezwungen, also Krriegserklärungen bekommen (genauso wie schon 1939) - mit dem einzigen Unterschied zu 1939, daß dieses Mal keine offizielle Kriegserklärung erfolgen muß, weil es ja immer noch keinen Friedensvertrag zwischen Deutschland, dem Deutschen Reich (um genau zu sein), und den Siegermächten gibt, die dieses Mal nur aus ihren Besatzerbaracken ausrücken müssen, um das Land erneut zu zerstören.Wir Deutsche waren und sind einfach zu erfolgreich und können schon allein deshalb nicht verhindern, daß andere Völker uns die Früchte des Erfolgs nicht gönnen und statt dessen (ich bevorzuge die alte Rechtschreibregelung, weil die neu die Logik zu wenig beachtet) ihrem Neid, ihrer Eifersucht, ihren Ressentiments freien Lauf geben, sobald sich ihnen eine Chance dafür eröffnet.
Ja, das ist richtig, und es spricht auch nicht gegen das von mir Gesagte - im Gegenteil: Vorsicht ist die Mutter der Porzellankiste, wie ein schönes Sprichwort sagt.Fangen wir oben an, werden wir höchstwahrscheinlich von unten Probleme kriegen (vgl. Krieg); fangen wir unten an, werden wir höchstwahrscheinlich von oben Probleme kriegen (vgl. Krieg; ); fangen wir rechts an, werden wir höchstwahrscheinlich von links Probleme kriegen (vgl. Krieg); ); fangen wir links an, werden wir höchstwahrscheinlich von rechts Probleme kriegen (vgl. Krieg). Man muß hierbei den Krieg gedanklich schon vorwegnehmen, weil man mit ihm rechnen muß, auch dann, wenn er ausbleibt. Diejenigen, die den Krieg wollen - und die gibt es immer (man denke nur daran, wieviel Geld und also Macht ihnen allein durch Krieg zuwächst) - werden alles daran setzen, ihn durchzusetzen; außerdem ist er ja schon da, nur eben noch nicht in Europa, wenn man von den Bürgerkriegen (besonders in Frankreich) absieht. |
644) Arminius, 20.02.2015, 00:55, 17:53, 18:17, 19:15 (2577-2580)
Orb wrote:
Solingen is not far from Düsseldorf, but not a suburb of Düsseldorf, and the Schwarzwald (Schwarzer Wald = Black Forest) is very far from Düsseldorf and Solingen.You paid 25 Pfennig for one draft beer? And this draft beer was a 0.2 liter one? Then it was in the 1950s, I guess. In the 1960's a 0.2 liter draft beer cost 40 Pfennig.Orb wrote:
Well, ....Here follows an example: What does it mean when rivers and lakes are always present in dreams?
|
2579 |
For the sake of not receiving another warning ( the gods know I don't need anymore racked on me..), I will avoid the use of the proverbial epithet that begins with the letter »N«, and instead use a softer term: »Wiggerization«. What is a »wigger«? A wigger is a Caucasian, who thinks, acts, dresses, etc like a....well...you know ( That word that begins with an *N*). With the advent of the rapper »Eminem«, Western culture has been a hothouse for these wiggers. The typical W. sags his pants ridiculously low, mumbles his speech, talks obnoxiously loud and exaggerates his gesticulations to compliment his overall ridiculous appearance. The typical W. thinks that he is tough as nails, that he is ultra-masculine. But actually he is rather feminine; he possess no originality or individuality --- his entire persona is the result of the trenchant influence of alterity, of the current ethos. »Monkey see - monkey do«. Whatever is perceived as being the most popular, the masses will conform to it, so they can fit in.
In this culture, the ideal W. is stupid. The more articulate you are, the more »White« you sound and, therefore less cool. Bastardizing the English language with ebonics -- primal guttural noises -- stupid drooling facial expressions -- clothes that are too big -- and music that sounds like something concocted by feral chimps banging pots and pans together in a kitchen are what's considered to be fashionable these days.
^^^ See this retard above? This is Jimmy.
Jimmy wrote:
»Yo Yo, my nukka! Whatz poppin, nukka? Yo, My nukka, lizen up, yo...That thot Shanequa is a bad bitch, yo....she be like Einstein, Nukka....given me some legit brain, yo....Thots be thots, nukka.....yo check out this white-boy over hurrrr...thinkz he all intellectual and shit with his normal sized clothes N shit....bro, needs to grow up in Christ and eat some meat yo...Church! Nukka..CHURCH!!!......we be ballen, shot callen....skeet skeet skeet.....yah BOY!!!«
Remember kids, the more stupid you are, the more cool you will become! Don't touch that goddamn apple! Bask in that circle of heavenly ignorance.....yes....very good, very good.... :evilfun: **
2580 |
I only had one dreAM LIKE THAT IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. It was after our son's suicide we went to India, and
then went to see Buddha's grave. There were some angry wasps that bit me on the right cheeck swelled terribly, then that night had a dream was trekking and up on top of a mountain the route came to a fork and had to decide which way to follow. I decided to the left. The panorama which enfolded me in a warm caress, were colored just like the above pictures. The the thought occured to me of what would have the other, the right side be, had i chosen that? **
What does it mean when rivers and lakes are always present in dreams? ** **
645) Arminius, 21.02.2015, 01:08, 01:41, 01:59, 02:26, 21:15, 22:02, 23:36 (2581-2587)
What is your problem here?A minority of students who do not study are nevertheless students - because they are as matriculated as the majority of students who study.Replace the word students by the word syncretistic humans and the word study by the word believe in a syncretistic religion.There is reality on the one side and ideality on the other side.
Jr Wells wrote:
Education? Primarily we are talking about religion, although religion has much to do with education.So you are saying that we will not get merely one syncretistic education system but many syncretistic education systems. Please tell me: why?
Jr Wells wrote:
That was just an example in order to explain what is meant, because you did not understand the other examples.Jr Wells wrote:
Yes. But that does not necessarily exclude that we will get merely one ....
Jr Wells wrote:
You said two times:Jr Wells wrote:
Jr Wells wrote:
That is not undertsanding - of course.And because of that fact I gave you one more example (**|**).Jr Wells wrote:
Why not?Perhaps you know the following two thread titles (topics) which are
also questions:
|
2585 |
The assumption is that because I do not agree with you that I do not understand you. **
When these things happen, then the probably of them having happened will be 100%. **
Sorry, I am not going to read other threads. **
2586 |
Feminism uses equality as an excuse to bring power to their group. **
2587 |
Islam is like Christianity .... **
Christianity on the one side and Judaism and Islam on the other side are much different.
For example: Christianity is not as much abrahamic and not as much monotheistic as Judaism and Islam are. In Christianity there is Maria as the mother of God, Jesus as the son of God, and the Holy Ghost of God. That's not really monotheistic. And the New Testament is very much different from the Old Testament. ** **
Nietzsche said that (for example) there are »ja-sagende« (»yes-saying«) and »nein-sagende« (»no-saying«) religions in both the Aryan (Indogerman) and the Semitic societies: Brahmanism as an Ayran (Indogerman) religion and Judaism or Islam as a Semitic religion are ja-sagende Religionen (yes-saying religions) whereas Buddhism as an Ayran (Indogerman) religion and Christianity as a Semitic religion are nein-sagende Religionen (nein-saying religions). Cp. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, Der Wille zur Macht (The Will to Power), S. 110-111. If that what Nietzsche said is right, then Christianity is even more similar to Buddhism than to Judaism or Islam. Again: There are no three Abrahamic religions because Christianity is too much different from Judaism and Islam. ** **
646) Arminius, 22.02.2015, 01:12, 02:10, 02:46, 03:18, 04:42, 04:52, 23:51 (2588-2594)
Mags J. wrote:
Mags J. wrote:
What does that exactly mean? Non--denominational does not mean the same in every country. So is it possible in the UK that even members of Non-Christian religions can join a Christian church by keeping / maintaining their Non-Christian religions?
Amorphos wrote:
That can be easily (perhaps too easily) said of each religion or of each misunderstood spiritual exercise system (that is how Peter Sloterdijk says, because according to him there are no religions but misunderstood spiritual exercise systems ). Moreover, those misunderstood spiritual exercise systems which you call Abrahamic acted not in a similar way when they had power and act not in a similar way when they have power.Amorphos wrote:
Your witch burnings are no argument, because you have to consider what took place at the same time and what takes place even nowadays (!) in countries of the Islam. And your power argument is not a convincing one. Who has still more power? Christians or Muslims? And although Christians have still more power than Muslims, Christians are still much more peaceful and civilisated than Muslims.Nietzsche was not always right, but he was right i.e. in the case of putting Brahmanism, Judaism, Islam on the one side and Buddhism, Christianity on the other side. That makes much more sense than the Abrahamic myth.Brahmanism, Judaism, and Islam are similar to aristocratic / oligarchical or even monarchical / tyrannical systems and more active than passive, whereas Buddhism and Christianity are similar to democratic / ochlocratic systems and more passive than active.
Mags J. wrote:
And you do not value it by saying i.e. thats not good or i.e thats good?
Jr Wells wrote:
How do you value that?Do you know the death philosophy of the German philosopher Martin Heidegger?
There was a Japanese-Soviet Nonaggression Pact during the whole Second World War, and this Japanese-Soviet Nonaggression Pact was the reason for no aggression in the East of the Soviet Union (Siberia). The Soviets were very much interested in it because of the front in the West of the Soviet Union (Russia): they did not want two fronts. But the Japanese were also very much interested in it because of similar reasons. It would have been very stupid, if one of them had attacked the other one.
Hey, Project, where is your response? You are a very slow machine. Are you a windmill in a desert?
Erik wrote:
Yes - I would agree with that. You can see this same will in non-conscious organisms. **Gib wrote:
Yes, that is one aspect of love but not the only one, like I said several times, and that is - b.t.w. - why I used the word love in the question of the topic of one of my threads: Do you really love philosophy? ** ** |
647) Arminius, 23.02.2015, 01:28, 03:01, 03:24, 03:36, 03:49, 15:02, 16:31, 18:32, 21:26, 23:20 (2595-2604)
Each of the three forms has its degenerated form which can always be interpreted as the negative form. So each of the three positive or better forms and each of the three negative or worse forms are merely subordinated forms of one form, thus there are three superordinated forms and six subordinated forms:1) the form of one ruler with (1a) monarchy as
the positive subordinated form and (1b) tyranny as the subordinated negative
form;
|
2596 |
2597 |
Fent wrote:
»Statiktech wrote:
What sorts of double standards? **
Progressives are fine with the Palestinian desire for self-determination, Australian Aboriginal self-determination, American Indian self-determination, African self-determination, Chinese self-determination, etc. etc. etc. However, any call for European nations (and their cousin states) to be self-determinate is met with screams of racism and Nazism.« **
That's a good example of leftist double standards. Another good one would be their belief that gender is a complete social construction, right up until a man decides he's 'actually a woman', then suddenly gender is a physical function of the brain that only surgery can correct. They also continually try to get people fired or shamed out of existence for innocuous comments that somebody could possibly interpret as being sexist, while laughing it off or forgiving it entirely when people on their side of the fence outright harass or molest women.
Feminists against Clinton? Not a one. Anti-war protesters after Obama got elected? An endangered species. **
2598 |
2599 |
I have recently been extremely been fascinated , or re-fascinated by the surrealists .... **
2600 |
What did Jesus say about sex? **
Did Jesus have sex? **
2601 |
Is beauty really in the eye of the beholder? What if there is a universal principle to beauty? Perhaps it's not as subjective, as you may think? Physical beauty is a manifestation of symmetry and genetic superiority. Sure, we may prefer X beauty over Y beauty ( subjective preferences ), but could one deny either their aesthetic value? I.e., their objective beauty?
2602 |
Arminius wrote:
»Perhaps Leibniz war greater than Kant ... (!) ... (?) ...(!).« ** **
Leibniz was more famous for mathematics rather than philosophy [on Monads].
Kant was born [1724] after Leibniz's death [1716].
Kant demonstrated the shortfalls of Leibniz's Monad and his »identity of indiscernible«. **
2603 |
2604 |
Arminius, let us say that all religions are interpretative, at least that we are subjective beings and cannot know things in the exact same way as other. That said ...:
The very idea of a single god is enough to create an ideological singularity, even where there are many variations of that in expression. This is why ALL religions have been given strict guidelines for practice e.g. dharma in Hinduism, Buddhism and Janism, and sharia law in Islam. christianity done the same thing via preaching and largely achieved it until various movements and industrial transformation changed our society.
The only difference is that Islam went in the opposite direction, starting out with grand philosophies, maths and cultural changes, but then becoming strict. The industrial revolution didnt happen in the middle-east, so their societies have been changed from western influences ~ and that is the real difference.
648) Arminius, 24.02.2015, 00:25, 17:33 (2605-2606)
Amorphos, excuse me, but if you can't see the differences, then you are either nearly blind or just political correct, and political correctness has merely to do with lies and hypocrises, thus nothing with reality / historical facts.Humans lived and live in different (A) cliamte zones and in different (B) cultural zones.(A) Climate zones:(B) Cultural zones:Cultural zones mean cultures that are influenced by the climate zones (see above) and other circumstances. It is no accident that nearly all monotheistic / henotheistic religions arised in deserts, and when they were brought to people in cultural zones without deserts, then the religions changed more or less (depending on where, how much different these zones were). I will not go into details because of the derailing danger.
I remind you of some texts on the first page of my thread Universe and Time: ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** |
649) Arminius, 25.02.2015, 01:44, 03:19, 18:35, 18:38 (2607-2610)
Jr Wells wrote:
We, us, our are not the correct words, because there are differences. Some people think this will help them, some people will think that will help them, some people think nothing or/and nobody will help them; some people think this shall or should help them, some peoplel think that shall or should help them, some people think nothing or/and nobody shall or should help them. There is no universal way of help .Jr Wells wrote:
Oh, look at this:
Please compare it with this:
(Cozy Powell, Dance with the Devil, 1973). |
2610 |
650) Arminius, 26.02.2015, 00:49, 02:33, 17:50, 02:33 (2611-2614)
Jr Wells wrote:
A black hole as the bottom of spirituality seems to be a very interesting one. Do you mind going into details?Zinnat wrote:
Mental practices like meditation. Good.
|
2612 |
Before the end of the First World War Einsteins theory stood outside the mainstream. **
The conflict between Newtonian mechanics and Maxwell-Lorentzs electromagnetism was best illustrated by the Michelson-Morley experiment which split a beam of light into two parts which were sent, by means of mirrors, to and fro along two equal and perpendicular arms one of which is aligned with the direction of movement of the Earths orbit and one at right angles to the orbit. On returning to their starting point the light produced a pattern of dark and bright fringes. The fringes remained in the same position throughout the year both when the arm aligned with the Earths orbit remained in its original position or, contrary to expectations, when the arm aligned in direction of movement was moved to a position at right angles to the orbit and the other arm was brought into alignment, i.e. when the position of the arms was reversed. This is contrary to the Maxwell-Lorentz theory, in which the velocity of light is independent of the motion of its source.
There are three possibilities: that the Maxwell-Lorentz theory is wrong; that Newtonian mechanics is wrong; or that there is some unknown effect of motion which has been overlooked. **
2613 |
2614 |
The only difference is that Islam went in the opposite direction, starting out with grand philosophies, maths and cultural changes, but then becoming strict.
==>
|