01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 |
121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 |
<= [1121][1122][1123][1124][1125][1126][1127][1128][1129][1130] => |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6862 |
6863 |
6864 |
6865 |
Us government used rock metal music on Arab terrorists as a torture method. **
6866 |
6867 |
Appropriate sexual behavior in 2017-2018 is for all modern males to cut your dick off and become a woman.
Otherwise you are guilty of sexual harassment and/or rape. **
|
6868 |
6869 |
6870 |
|
6871 |
6872 |
There is no such thing as absolute independent objectivity that can stand on its own without being subjected to some framework of cognitions by subjects. ** (**)
6873 |
Arminius wrote:
»Prismatic 567 wrote:
There is no such thing as absolute independent objectivity that can stand on its own without being subjected to some framework of cognitions by subjects. ** (**)
If you state that there »is no such thing as absolute independent objectivity«, then you have just declared that is so according to an absolute independent objectivity.
In addition: If there really (objectively) is no absolute independent objectivity, then there really (objectively) is no absolute independent subjectivity either.« ** **
Prismatic 567 wrote:
»Framework of cognitions by subjects.« ** (**)
We philosophers call that an »ontology«. **
The compound word ontology combines onto--, from the Greek on, on (gen. ontoV, ontos), i.e. »being; that which is«, which is the present participle of the verb eimi, eimí, i.e. »to be, I am«, and -logia, -logia, i.e. »logical discourse«, see classical compounds for this type of word formation.
While the etymology is Greek, the oldest extant record of the word itself, the New Latin form ontologia, appeared in 1606 in the work Ogdoas Scholastica by Jacob Lorhard (Lorhardus) and in 1613 in the Lexicon philosophicum by Rudolf Göckel (Goclenius).
The first occurrence in English of ontology as recorded by the OED (Oxford English Dictionary, online edition, 2008) came in a work by Gideon Harvey (1636/71702): Archelogia philosophica nova; or, New principles of Philosophy. Containing Philosophy in general, Metaphysicks or Ontology, Dynamilogy or a Discourse of Power, Religio Philosophi or Natural Theology, Physicks or Natural philosophy, London, Thomson, 1663. The word was first used in its Latin form by philosophers based on the Latin roots, which themselves are based on the Greek.
Leibniz is the only one of the great philosophers of the 17th century to have used the term ontology. **
6874 |
Rank | Country | External Debt (US-$) | Date | Per Capita (US-$) | % of GDP | |
1 | USA | 18,624,000,000,000 | 30-06-2017 | 57,300 | 98 |
... | |||||
13 | China | 1,562,800,000,000 | 30-06-2017 | 1,100 | 13 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is a Eurasian political, economic, and security organisation, the creation of which was announced on 15 June 2001 in Shanghai, China by the leaders of China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan; the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Charter was signed in June 2002 and entered into force on 19 September 2003. These countries, except for Uzbekistan, had been members of the Shanghai Five group, founded on 26 April 1996 in Shanghai. India and Pakistan joined SCO as full members on 9 June 2017 in Astana, Kazakhstan. **
The 16+1 format is an initiative by the Peoples Republic of China aimed at intensifying and expanding cooperation with 11 EU Member States and 5 Balkan countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia) in the fields of investments, transport, finance, science, education, and culture. In the framework of the initiative, China has defined three potential priority areas for economic cooperation: infrastructure, high technologies, and green technologies.
Meeting of China-CEEC Business Council and Business Support Organizations.
Paying high importance and contribution to the cooperation with China and 16 Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries within the 16+1 platform, Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA), organizer of the Business Forum within The 5th Meeting of Heads of Government of 16+1 countries last year in November, in cooperation with China-CEEC Business Council organized three-day meeting in Latvia.
Presentations of Meeting of China-CEEC Business Council and Business Support Organizations, June 20, 2017 are available here (**). **
|
6875 |
I think most here, atheists and theists alike, agree that you're delusional. **
Prismatic 567 wrote:
»Snark wrote:
I think most here, atheists and theists alike, agree that you're delusional. **
....
Delusional:
1. having false or unrealistic beliefs or opinions:
2. - maintaining fixed false beliefs even when confronted with facts. **....« **
And you fit the definition perfectly. **
6876 |
The problem with many of Prismatics criticisms is that he does not distinguish between the Ground of existence, what many theists call »God and things that have existence. **
6877 |
Snark wrote:
»The point is, he undermines his own philosophy and therefore yours. The quote I cited is from Critique of Pure Reason, quite fittingly near the end of the book. Is it not odd that critics of religion, like you, argue like Kant is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but ignore his conclusion?« (Snark, by the way, where and when did you wrote this? I could not find this text.)
Based on the many polls, Kant is recognized as one of the greatest Western philosopher of all times. I have high respect for Kants philosophy but I do not agree with EVERYTHING he proposed, and for whatever I agree with Kant, I ensured it is justified soundly. **
The problem is theists are compelled by subliminal psychological compulsion to hastily stop the infinite regression and jumped to the conclusion [based on faith] to insist God is the final cause which is a leap beyond the empirical. Such a God that stopped infinite regression can never be an empirically possible God at all, but is merely based on thoughts and pure primal psychological reasons. This is merely speculation and wishful thinking to cover and soothe the psychological angst pulsating from the deep chasms of the psyche. **
What I have proven is 'God is an Impossibility' based on logic, reason and argument. **
As such, in terms of truth, it is moot and a non-starter even to raise the question of whether God exists or not as real within an empirical-rational reality.
The »idea of God« emerged into human consciousness merely as a thought to soothe the inherent unavoidable existential angst, i.e. for psychological reasons and never for consideration whether it is real or not.
Theists must be mindful and responsible that when they insist God is 'real', they are directly and indirectly contributing to an emergence of an ideology that is a double-edged sword that bring good and terrible evils.
This supposedly real God as claimed also deliver real holy texts [via messenger] that include evil laden elements that compel and inspire evil prone believers to commit terrible evils and violence upon non-believers. **
|
6878 |
This time, Ill be the »lackey« (**).
Arminius is exactly right.
**
I noted the above.
I will not bother to response unless there is something of substance. There is none in the above. **
And you have shown this in each of your posts.
Note that we have given you a lot of arguments and logically proven you wrong. And these arguments are not based on religion, but on logic. You are confusing almost everything.
You really do not know what you are talking about. Why should we take you seriously?
We have proven you wrong. So why should we always repeat this? We have done this in each of your threads.
And your misuse of Kant is a fcat too, it is easily provable that he has never said »God is an impossibility«. So you are a liar and faker too. ** **
|
6879 |
This time, Ill be the »lackey« (**).
Arminius is exactly right.
**
6880 |
|
6881 |
Christianity is a monotheistic religion because it has only one God. God the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost are simply different manifestations of the same God. They are three in one not three separate from each other. **
Furthermore the First Commandment clearly states there is only one God. **
6882 |
6883 |
6884 |
6885 |
Deconstructing Western Civilization.
....
So it's best to begin again .... **
6886 |
6887 |
|
6888 |
6889 |
There such a Reality cannot be related to the empirical possible multiple realities. **
James S. Saint wrote:
»So what you have to prove and demonstrate is that there is no Reality, no uni-verse.« **
My point;
1. To the theist, »God is Reality itself« ( F A L S E ! )
2. God is an Impossibility - argument re OP ( F A L S E ! )
3. Therefore »Reality« [theists] is an impossibility. ( F A L S E ! ) **
|
6890 |
|
6891 |
6892 |
6893 |
6894 |
==>
|